How the context window grew 4,883×

From 2K to 10M in 1,097 days, measured across 131 releases that disclose one.

6 of the 131 releases with a disclosed context window set a new maximum. The rest shipped under a ceiling someone had already reached — which is the useful shape here: the frontier moves in a few large steps, not continuously.

10K100K1M10M PaLM — 2K, April 4, 2022Claude 1 — 9K, March 14, 2023Claude 2 — 100K, July 11, 2023GLM-4 — 128K, January 16, 2024Gemini 1.5 Pro — 2.1M, February 15, 2024Llama 4 Scout — 10M, April 5, 20252022202320242025
Frontier context window, log scale. The line holds at each level until a larger one ships — that is what the data says happened, and a sloped line would invent a rate of change between two dated announcements.

Every step of the frontier

A release appears here only if it disclosed a larger context window than anything before it. 149 of 280 records disclose no context window at all and cannot appear — see data quality.

Claude 1 · 2023 9K · 4×
Claude 2 · 2023 100K · 11×
GLM-4 · 2024 128K · 1×
Gemini 1.5 Pro · 2024 2.1M · 16×

The largest single jump

Gemini 1.5 Pro multiplied the frontier by 16×, from 128K to 2.1M, 30 days after GLM-4 set the previous mark. Both figures are traced to the labs' own announcements — follow them from Gemini 1.5 Pro.

What this cannot tell you

A context window is what the lab says the model accepts. It is not a claim about what the model uses well: retrieval quality across a full window is a benchmark question, and this dataset records no benchmark it has not traced to a primary source. Nor is the absence of a figure evidence of a small window — 149 records disclose nothing here, and most of those are proprietary models whose labs publish no specification at all.

Back to analytics →
Compare two models side by side →